VACCINATIONS - The Hour of the Time
ALEX LOGLIA ON "THE HOUR OF THE TIME"
I want to warn you in advance folks that tonight I am going to do a
lot of reading; I'm going to quote a lot of different people, and I
want you to understand from the start that I am not making up anything
from what I'm going to be saying here tonight, but that everything I
mention here is scientific fact which I have discovered in my own
I make this warning because you are not going to want to believe
what you are about to hear. I'm going to talk to you tonight about
vaccinations. Most of you out there have probably received some form of
vaccination at one point or another in your life, or you may have
children who are in the process of receiving vaccinations. Well, I have
some very bad news for you folks; you, once again, have been conned. I
am sure, that you, like myself, have been raised to believe that
doctors know what is best for you, that everything that comes out of
the medical industry is done to help you and that everything that
doctors do is safe and well-tested and proven, vaccinations included.
Unfortunately, we have all been lied to, and once again, me and all
of you are responsible because we would rather put the responsibility
of our health into someone else's hands, instead of taking charge of
our own lives and our own well-being.
I'm going to say this bluntly, so that it will make an impact on you
and so that you will hear me. You and your children are being poisoned,
folks, and you are making pharmaceutical companies incredibly rich, and
you are also unknowingly helping along the progress of what is going to
become the greatest epidemic that the human race has ever seen, namely
AIDS. With ignorance and foolish trust in the experts, you have been
Now, the theory of vaccinations is based on four basic principles.
Number one: Vaccinations are relatively harmless; Number two:
Vaccinations are effective; Number three: Vaccinations are responsible
for the decline of infectious diseases, and Number four: Vaccinations
are the only practical and dependable way to prevent both epidemics and
potentially dangerous diseases. But, ladies and gentlemen, every single
one of these assumptions is totally false.
The theory of vaccinations states that by giving a person a mild
form of the disease, by the use of an immunizing agent, specific
antibodies are produced that will protect the organism when the real
thing comes along. it sounds plausible enough, but it is totally wrong.
No greater lie has ever been told to you, and believe it or not,
vaccinations will not protect you from any disease and you can still
get, and many people are getting measles, small pox, polio, rubella,
diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus and other common diseases even after
they have been vaccinated. This is a matter of public record, and I
will give you some statistics later on that will truly shock you.
Let me read you a little portion from Walene James' book,
Immunizations; the Reality Behind the Myth. But before that, write down
this author and title; that's Walene James, W-a-l-e-n- e, last name
James, J-a-m-e-s, and the title is Immunizations; the Reality Behind
the Myth. Most of what I'm reading from here tonight comes right out of
that book, and it's very well footnoted and documented, but to save
time, I'm not going to read you all the references, but you can get
The book and you can check it out and you can check out the references.
Here we go...
Besides introducing foreign proteins and even live viruses into the
bloodstream, each vaccine has its own preservative, neutralizer and
carrying agent, none of which are indigenous to the body. For instance,
the triple antigen, DPT, which is the Diphtheria, Pertussis, Tetanus
vaccine, contains the following poisons: Formaldehyde, Mercury, and
aluminum phosphate, and that's from the Physician's Desk Reference,
1980. The packet insert accompanying the vaccine, lists the following
poisons: aluminum potassium sulfate, a mercury derivative called
Thimersol and sodium phosphate. The packet insert for the polio vaccine
lists monkey kidney cell culture, lactalbumin hydrozylate, antibiotics
and calf serum. The packet insert for the MMR vaccine produced by Merck
Sharp and Dhome which is for measles, mumps and rubella lists chick
embryo and neomycin, which is a mixture of antibiotics.
Now chick embryo, monkey kidney cells and calf serum are all foreign
proteins which are biological substances composed of animal cells which
because they enter directly into the bloodstream can become part of our
genetic material. They can become part of our genetic material, folks,
remember that, it's going to be important later. These foreign
proteins, as well as other carriers and reaction products of a vaccine
are potential allergens and can produce anaphylactic shock. Folks,
anaphylactic shock is a nice word for brain damage. Reading on...
Another problem with vaccines is that they go directly into the
bloodstream without filtering by the liver. Dr. William Albrecht tells
us the following, "If you take water into your system as a drink, it
goes into your bloodstream directly from the stomach, but if you take
in fats, they move in through your lymphatic system. When you take
other substances like carbohydrates and proteins, they go into the
intestines and from there are passed into the liver as the body's
chemical filter. Before they go out into the blood and circulate in the
body. Most of your vaccination serums and proteins are not filtered by
the liver, consequently vaccinations can be a terrific shock to the
system. Injections of foreign substances like viruses, toxins and
foreign proteins into the blood stream via vaccinations, have been
associated with diseases and disorders to the blood, brain, nervous
system and skin. Rare diseases such as atypical measles and monkey
fever as well as such well- known disorders as premature aging,
allergies, etc. have been associated with vaccines. Also linked to
immunizations are such well-known diseases as cancer, leukemia,
paralysis, multiple sclerosis, arthritis, and sudden infant death
Folks, I'm not
making this up. This is mostly out of Physician's Desk Reference, 1980,
and Organic Consumer Reports of 1977.
Now, let me tell you some of the effects of vaccinations that the
medical profession admits to as expected side effects of various
vaccines, again from Walene James' book. The insert for the DTP
vaccine, which is for Diphtheria, Pertussis and Tetanus, under side
effects and adverse reactions are listed the following:
- Severe temperature elevations 105 degrees or
- Collapse with rapid recovery.
- Collapse followed by prolonged prostration in
- Screaming episodes.
- Isolated convulsions with or without fever.
encephalopathy, which is brain damage, with changes in the level of
consciousness, focal neurological signs, convulsions with or without
permanent neurological and/or mental deficit.
Nice big words, folks, but it's talking about brain damage, shock and
The occurrence of sudden infant death syndrome, which is SIDS,
that's the acronym, has been reported following the DPT vaccine. Now,
the whooping cough vaccine which is a component in the DPT vaccine has
such a high percentage of neurological complications, including death,
that several physicians have decided not to give it at all.
And that is quoting Dr. Robert Mendelsohn. He goes on to say, Dr.
Edward B. Shaw, a distinguished university of California physician has
stated in the Journal of the American Medical Association in March,
1975, "I doubt that the decrease in pertussis is due to the vaccine,
which itself is a very poor antigen, and an extremely dangerous one,
with many very serious complications."
Reading on from Walene James' book: "A recent study at UCLA
estimates that as many as 1 in every 13 children had persistent,
high-pitched crying after the DTP shot. This may be indicative of brain
damage in the recipient child," says Dr. Bobby Young. And later on he
says, "You know, we start off with healthy infants, and we pop them not
once, but three or four times with a vaccine. The probability of
causing damage is the same each time. My greatest fear is that very few
of them escape some kind of neurological damage out of this."
An even more recent figure on the reaction to the DTP vaccine
indicates that 1 in every 100 children react with convulsions or
collapse or high-pitched screaming. One out of every 3 of these, that
is 1 out of every 300 will remain permanently damaged. Now, according
to the testimony of the Assistant Secretary of Health, Edward Grant,
Jr., before the u.S. Senate Committee on May 3rd, 1985, every year
35,000 children suffer neurological damage because of the DTP vaccine.
Bet your doctor didn't tell you that, folks. It just makes you wonder
why he never told you this, doesn't it. It also makes you want to run
out and get your kids vaccinated, doesn't it? Well, it gets worse.
Here are some of the long term effects of vaccines. This brings us
to perhaps the most serious charge against vaccination, the subtle
long-term effects. And again, I'm reading from Walene James' book.
Evidence suggests that immunizations damage the immune system
itself. By focusing exclusively on increased antibody production, which
is only one aspect of the immune process, immunizations isolate
dysfunction and allow it to substitute for the entire immune response,
because vaccines trick the body so that it will no longer initiate a
generalized response. They accomplished what the entire immune system
seems to have been evolved to prevent. That is, they place the virus
directly into the blood and give it access to the major immune organs
and tissues without any obvious way of getting rid of it.
The long-term persistence of viruses and other foreign proteins
within the cells of the immune system has been implicated in a number
of chronic and degenerative diseases. In 1976 Dr. Robert Simpson of
Rutgers university addressed science writers at a seminar of the
American Cancer Society, and pointed out the following. "Immunization
programs against flu, measles, mumps, polio and so forth may actually
be seeding humans with RNA to form latent pro viruses in cells
throughout the body. These latent pro viruses could be molecules in
search of diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis,
lupus, Parkinson's disease, and perhaps cancer."
Remember that, folks, seeding humans with RNA to form latent pro
viruses in cells throughout the body. That's important. Moving on...
Live viruses, the primary antigenic material of vaccines, (don't be
scared by antigenic, folks, it just means any agent that will stimulate
antibody production) the primary antigenic material of vaccines, which
are live viruses, are capable of surviving or remaining latent in the
host cell for years, without provoking acute disease. They attach their
own genetic material as an extra particle or episome to the chromosomes
of the host cell and replicate along with it. This allows the host cell
to continue its own normal functions for the most part, but imposes on
it additional instructions for the synthesis of viral proteins. This
presence of antigenic material in the host cell can not fail to provoke
auto immune phenomenon, such as herpes, shingles, warts, tumors, both
benign and malignant, and diseases of the central nervous system such
as various forms of paralysis and inflammation of the brain.
So what we're actually talking about here, folks, is viral genetic
material being incorporated into your cells, and laying the groundwork
for auto immune diseases. And we're going to get into this right now.
If the components of the immune system were designed to help the
organism discriminate self from non-self as a number of researchers
believe, then latent viruses, auto immune phenomenon and cancer would
seem to represent different aspects of chronic immune failure, wherein
the immune system cannot recognize its own cells as unambiguously its
own, or eliminate parasites as unequivocally foreign. By the same
token, we might say that the inability of the immune system to
distinguish between harmful and harmless substances in the environment,
such as allergies, constitutes another aspect of chronic immune failure.
Folks, what they're saying here is that vaccines encourage chronic
immune failure, by virtue of the genetic material that you get shot up
into your bloodstream whenever you get vaccinated.
The well-known author, lecturer and health activist, Betty Lee
Morales, writes that her parents who were naturopathic doctors
predicted 50 years ago that cancer would be epidemic in her lifetime as
a result of mass vaccinations.
Dr. Robert Mendelsohn, who is an authority on vaccinations, and
truly one of the most heroic medical doctors in this century...
[Because he is telling the truth]... extends this idea when he says, "I
think that most of the degenerative diseases are going to be shown to
be due to x-rays, drugs and polluted food, additives, preservatives,
and immunizations. With all of our discoveries about the effects on the
human body of ingesting substances not found in nature, one thing we
ought to know by now, is that many of these toxins, and vaccinations
are toxins by definition, kill slowly, or kill only after the lapse of
significant periods of time.
And that's a quote from Nicholas von Hoffman in his Washington Post
column. Now from around the world. From West Germany, we read of more
vaccination casualties. A reader writing to Organic Consumer Report,
June 13, 1968 mentions an article which appeared in Medical World which
stated that about 3,000 children each year suffer varying degrees of
brain damage as a result of the small pox vaccination. This same writer
mentions another medical journal in which Dr. G. Kotel reported that in
the previous year, small pox vaccination damaged the hearing of 3,296
children in W. Germany and 71 became totally deaf. Hearing loss was
reported by Dr. William Albrecht, who said in the article that I quoted
earlier, that a typhoid shot he received made him stone deaf in one ear
as well as deathly ill at the time of the shot. Now listen to this,
folks, because this is where the big con starts.
In case after case of deaths which are really deaths from
vaccinations, the cause of death is never listed as the vaccine.
Asthma, however, acute lymphatic leukemia, streptococcal cellulitis,
tubercular meningitis, and infantile paralysis are just a few of the
fake causes of death listed on the death certificate of people who are
dying from vaccinations. So much for these poisons being safe, now
let's see how effective they are.
Statistics from around the world show unequivocally that infectious
diseases like small pox, diphtheria, whooping cough, scarlet fever,
etc., began to disappear long before vaccinations ever came on the
scene. Now I'm quoting World Health Statistics Annual 1973-1976, Volume
II. "There has been a steady decline of infectious diseases in most
developing countries regardless of the percentage of immunizations
administered in these countries."
I'll bet you didn't know that, folks, and I'll bet you didn't know
this either, but I do know this from my research and from my own
experimentation; personal hygiene and diet stop diseases, folks, not
injecting virulent free-floating genetic material into your veins with
all kinds of poisonous cancerous carrying agents which is what vaccines
are. I'm going to now give you a key as to why you've been conned into
believing that vaccines do stop diseases. I'm looking at a chart from
Australian Nurses Journal from June of 1981. A top chart shows a curve
of deaths per million children under 15 attributable to scarlet fever,
diphtheria, whooping cough and measles. We're looking at a graph here.
The graph runs the years from 1860 to 1965, and the death rate just
goes down, having peaked in 1860 at 6,000 fatalities per million, and
bottoming out near zero in 1965. So, it's just a downward sloping line
going down from 6000 to 0 from 1860 to 1965. It looks really
impressive, like could all of these communicable diseases have been
However, the only problem is that immunizations were introduced into
this picture in the 1940s when the number of fatalities per million had
already dropped from 6000 to 1000, thus from looking at the nearly
straight line of the curve, you see that the vaccinations did
absolutely nothing, because there is no alteration in the rate of
disappearance of these diseases from the vaccinations, at the time when
the vaccinations first started to be administered.
A similar chart below it refers to tuberculosis and typhoid from
1900 to 1960, and again the line's a straight slopes downward, and you
can see that the epidemics simply ran their course naturally, and are
totally unaffected by the vaccination programs, but the medical
industry wants you to believe that vaccines are what wipe out diseases
and that is totally a bold-faced lie.
If you've never read the book, How To Lie With Statistics, by Daryl
Huff, I strongly suggest you do because you will get a much better idea
of how you've been tricked.
Now, I want to tell you about a much bigger lie that you've been
fed. I want to talk to you about polio, because polio is a disease that
most people think was the great success story of vaccinations. Let me
read again from Walene James' book. Jonas Salk, the discoverer of the
Salk polio vaccine has been called the 20th century miracle maker, and
the savior of countless lives. We read glowing reports of the dramatic
decrease in polio in the u.S. as a result of the Salk vaccine.
For instance, the Virginia State Department of Health distributes a
folder which tells us that polio vaccines reduced the incidence of
polio in the u.S. from 18,000 cases in 1954 to fewer than 20 in
1973-78. A recent article in Modern Maturity states that in 1953 there
were 15,000 some odd cases of polio in the u.S. and by 1957 due to the
Salk vaccine, the number had dropped to 2499.
However, during the 1962 Congressional hearings on HR10541, Dr.
Bernard Greenberg, head of the Department of Biostatistics at the
university of North Carolina, School of Public Health, testified that
not only [now listen to this, folks...] not only did polio increase
substantially after the introduction of mass and frequently compulsory
immunization programs, but statistics were manipulated and statements
made by the Public Health Service to give the opposite impression.
You have been lied to folks. The polio vaccine caused more polio than
it protected people from. Moving on...
For instance, in 1957, the North Carolina Health Department made
glowing claims for the efficacy of the Salk vaccine, showing how polio
steadily decreased from 1953 to 1957. These figures were challenged by
Dr. Fred Klenner who pointed out that it wasn't until 1955 that a
single person in the state even received the polio vaccine injection.
Even then, the injections were administered on a very limited basis
because of the number of polio cases resulting from the vaccine. It
wasn't until 1956 that polio vaccinations assumed inspiring
proportions. The 61% drop in polio cases in 1954 was credited to the
Salk vaccine, when it wasn't even in the state yet. Nevertheless, by
1957, when the massive vaccination program had taken place, polio was
again on the increase.
Digest that for a minute, folks, let Bill flip the tape over, and
we'll be back in a minute......... Okay, back to the Salk vaccine.
Other ways polio statistics were manipulated to give the impression of
Salk vaccine success follow:
- Redefinition of an epidemic. More cases were
refer to polio as an epidemic after the introduction of the Salk
vaccine. In other words, you needed 20 cases per hundred thousand to
have an epidemic before the vaccine was introduced, and after the
vaccine they changed that number to 35 cases per hundred thousand per
year to require the definition of epidemic.
of the disease. In order to qualify for classification as paralytic
polio mytolitis, the patient had to exhibit paralytic symptoms for at
least 60 days after the onset of the disease.
Now that's after they started the vaccination programs, folks.
Before the vaccination program started in 1954, the patient had to
exhibit paralytic symptoms for only 24 hours. What this means folks, is
that if you walked into a doctor's office before the vaccine was
introduced, and you said, "Oh, I have paralytic symptoms here. I've had
them for about 2 weeks." They'd say, "Oh, that's polio. You've had it
for more than a day." But after the vaccine, if after the vaccine, you
walked into that same doctor's office, and you say, "Oh, I've had these
symptoms for 2 or 3 weeks, now." They'd say, "Oh, wait two months, then
we can call it polio." That's how the statistics get manipulated,
folks. Moving on...
Doctor Greenberg said, "This change in definition meant that in 1955
we started reporting a new disease, namely paralytic poliomyelitis,
with a longer lasting paralysis.
The third way statistics were manipulated was mislabeling. After the
introduction of the Salk vaccine, cocsacci virus and aseptic meningitis
have been distinguished from paralytic poliomyelitis," explained Dr.
Greenberg, "and in 1954 large numbers of these cases were undoubtedly
mislabeled as paralytic polio." Now, another way of reducing the
incidence of disease by way of semantics or statistical artifacts, as
Dr. Greenberg calls it, is to simply reclassify the disease.
Now, I have my own version of this here, folks. From the Los Angeles
County Health Index Morbidity and Mortality Reportable Disease Data,
I'm looking at a chart of cases of viral or aseptic meningitis and
polio from 1955 to 1966, and lo and behold, what do I find. From 1955
to 1966 cases of polio dropped from 273 cases to 5. Ah, but, the number
of cases of aseptic meningitis from 1955 to 1966 increases in almost
the same proportion from 50 cases to 256 cases. They simply changed the
name, same disease, and you thought polio was wiped out at that point.
Now, folks, the reality is this. Diseases, like everything else in
nature, follow cycles. They come in, they reach their peak and leave,
and no vaccination program on Earth has ever been able to change that.
Polio disappeared in Europe between 1940 and 1950 without any
vaccination programs, whatsoever.
In 1958, Israel had a massive type 1 polio epidemic after mass
immunizations. And from the same hearings on HR10541, that I talked
about earlier, we find out that Massachusetts had a type 2 polio
outbreak and there were more paralytic cases in people who were triple
vaccinated than in the people who were unvaccinated. Surprise,
surprise! You thought the vaccine protected you, didn't you? Well, most
of those cases of polio came from the vaccination. And that's fact,
folks. Even Jonas Salk has admitted it now that more than two-thirds of
the polio in this country [then] came from his vaccine. From Coutler
and Fisher's book, DPT: A Shot in The Dark, we learn:
There is a natural tendency for doctors to under-report whooping
cough when it occurs in a vaccinated population, and to over report it
when it appears in an unvaccinated population. Which means that if you
go into a doctor's office and you are allegedly vaccinated, and you
have whooping cough, they won't call it whooping cough. They'll call it
something else, and that's how they keep all our statistics nice and
safe and clean. Same thing's been done with measles, folks; reading
from Walene James' book:
- From 1958 to 1966, the number of measles cases
each year dropped from 800,000 to 200,000. The drug industry claimed
this was due to vaccinations. However, there are some very interesting
discrepancies. Number one, the incidence of measles had already been
declining steadily for the past 100 years and was totally unaffected by
the immunization programs for measles.
- It wasn't until
1967 that the live virus vaccine, which is presently used, was
introduced, because the killed virus vaccine which came out in 1963 was
found to be ineffective and harmful, and yet, the vaccine which was
good, and which they alleged did the job, did not even come out during
the time that they are trying to take credit for wiping out the
- A survey of pediatricians in New York City
revealed that only 3.2% of them were actually reporting measles cases
to the Health Department, and
- in 1974 the Center for
Disease Control determined that there were 36 cases of measles in all
of Georgia. But the Georgia State Surveillance System reported 660
cases that same year. Folks, you can't believe anything you read,
because every single statistic out there has been manipulated and
twisted, and that's a fact that I can tell you unequivocally, from my
own research. Let me read a little bit about rubella here:
A large proportion of children are found to be sero-negative (which
means they show no evidence of immunity in blood tests) 4-5 years after
receiving the rubella vaccination. In another study, 80% of army
recruits who had been immunized against rubella, came down with the
disease. Once again, folks, evidence that these vaccinations will not
even protect you against the disease they are supposed to protect you
from. And it goes on to say here that the same results were shown in a
consecutive study that took place in an institution for the mentally
Now, could the real reason vaccination promise and performance seem
so contradictory be that the vaccination premise itself is faulty? As
stated earlier, the theory of vaccination postulates that the use of
immunizing agents produces a mild form of the disease for which
specific antibodies are formed that will protect the body when the real
thing comes along. But as I mentioned earlier, it doesn't work that way
and Dr. Alec Burton, who is another brave doctor out there, points out
That there are children with what is called A Gamma Globulin Anemia
[which means that they cannot produce antibodies], and yet these same
children develop and recover from measles and other diseases as
spontaneously as other children.
Now what this means is that there are children out there who can't
produce antibodies. Nevertheless, antibodies are the things that
vaccines are supposed to stimulate in you against the particular
diseases they're designed for, and yet, as shown here by Dr. Alec
Burton, even without those antibodies, you will get cured or you will
naturally become healthy again after having this disease without any
vaccination. So, folks, so much for the idea that vaccinations are the
only way to protect you, and the basic premise that they are built on,
namely stimulating antibodies, is totally wrong.
Okay. Another quote from Walene James' book. The mystery begins to
unravel when we look at the work of Drs. Dettman and Kalikerinos. In
one of their articles, they quote Dr. Wendall Bellfield of San Jose,
California, who says the following. "Antibodies are not needed when the
primary immunological defense which is leukocytes and interferon, etc.
is functioning at maximum capacity.
Interferon production appears to occur only when the ascorbate level
[and ascorbate is just a big word for vitamin C] and the primary
defense components are at low levels, thereby permitting some viruses
to survive the primary defense.
What this basically means, folks, is that the premise that
vaccinations are built upon are totally false. Vaccinations are
allegedly designed to stimulate antibody production for the specific
diseases they're designed for, and yet, as Dr. Burton showed earlier,
antibodies are not even necessary for your body to properly and
effectively combat diseases.
In short, folks, this means that vaccines do not protect you against
the diseases they are supposed to protect you from. Diseases, in this
day and age have become self-fulfilling prophecy because doctors tend
not to diagnose specific diseases if the subject has already been
vaccinated against those specific diseases. Vaccinations,
unquestionably, do not guarantee you any protection, their side effects
are disastrous, and often worse than the disease, itself, and worse
still, the premise that vaccines are built upon, are pure,
You've been taught that antibodies, are the little shock troops of
your immune system, that they go out and kill all the nasty germs that
are attacking you day in and day out, and the reality, however, is that
antibody production is not your primary immunological defense, and that
the idea of stimulating them by injecting you with poisons, serums, and
free-floating genetic material, and all kinds of poisonous agents and
stabilizers and vaccines, is completely absurd.
Okay, let me read you a little bit about immunity here, because it's
going to become important over the next few minutes in what I'm talking
about. When immunity to a disease is acquired naturally, [and again,
from Walene James' book] the possibility of reinfection is only 3.2%,
according to journalist Marion Thompson. If the immunity comes from a
vaccination, however, the chance of reinfection is 80%.
Did you hear that, folks? Eighty percent chance of reinfection from
unnaturally acquired immunity from vaccinations. Dr. William Howard Hay
has pointed out that in any epidemic of communicable disease, only a
small percentage of the population contracts the disease. Most people
are naturally immune, so if a man who has been vaccinated does not
contract the disease that really proves absolutely nothing. If he had
not been vaccinated, the chances are he would not have contracted the
disease, anyway. We have no way of knowing. Further,
Just because you give somebody a vaccine and maybe get an antibody
reaction doesn't mean a thing. The only true antibodies, of course, are
those you get naturally.
And that's from Dr. Dettman in an interview with Jay Patrick.
Natural diseases are a lot safer than acute artificial complications
from vaccinations. And that's a quote from Dr. Robert Mendelsohn, whom
I mentioned earlier.
However, perhaps the strongest statement against the effectiveness
of artificial immunization comes from Dr. William Howard Hay. It is
nonsense to think that you can inject pus, which is most of the serums
that we're talking about, into a little child, and in any way improve
its health. There is no such thing as immunization, but we sell it
under that name. If we could, by any means, build up a natural
resistance to disease through these artificial means, I would applaud
it to the echo, but we cannot do it.
The body has its own methods of defense. These defense methods
depend upon the vitality of the body at the time. If it is vital
enough, the body will resist all infections. If it isn't vital enough,
it won't and you can't change the vitality of the body for the better
by introducing poisons of any kind into it.
And those poisons of any kind he's referring to are vaccines.
Vaccinations are poisons, they do not protect you, they are weakening
our immune systems, and my research indicates that allergies are the
direct result of large scale immunization programs foisted upon us in
the last fifty years, and isn't it weird how right now, there is such a
big push on to force every child and every person in the u.S. to be
vaccinated for all kinds of diseases. Thanks, Bill Clinton. Now, be
logical, folks. The only person you put at risk, even by the medical
industry's own stupid logic is yourself, if you refuse to be
vaccinated. Think about it; if everyone else is vaccinated, then they
shouldn't get the disease, right? Then the only person that you're
putting at risk by not being vaccinated is you. Makes sense. Then how
does the government dare to justify forced vaccination?
I can assure you that even without any intentionally created
diseases, many Americans will be dying over the next ten to fifteen
years, and AIDS will be blamed. Be careful.
Wouldn't it be ironic if AIDS as we know it, did not exist at all.
>From my own research I can tell you with complete confidence
the vaccines being foisted upon us can weaken our immune systems to the
degree that AIDS-like symptoms and reactions will be all too common
with or without AIDS. Do you remember what I read earlier about the
genetic material being introduced into our bloodstreams from
vaccinations, and producing auto-immune diseases. Folks, we don't even
need a government-created disease to have massive epidemic rates of
auto-immune failure, because that's what these vaccines are promoting.
Now you've been conned another way, and this is by the word virus.
Because you think you know what a virus is, and you do not. Rest
assured viruses are not what you think they are, and I'm gonna quote
you a little bit more from Walene , to give you a hint.
All living organisms, including bacteria and viruses contain genetic
material, which is DNA and RNA. In fact, live viruses themselves are
Live bacteria and viruses can transfer their genetic information
through animal cells, including human cells which are taken up by other
cells in the body. Although the body generally will not make antibodies
against its own tissue, it appears that slight modifications of the
antigenic character of tissues will cause it to appear foreign to the
immune system, and thus a fair target for antibody production.
[Remember what I said earlier, about how vaccines give us genetic
material that can incorporate into our cells.]
Thus vaccines lay the foundation for auto-immune diseases and other
disorders of the immune system such as rheumatoid arthritis, rheumatic
fever, lupus, sclerodema, and a lot of other nasty diseases. It is
reasonable to assume that our contemporary "epidemic of allergies" has
at least some of its roots in the practice of vaccination.
And again, that's from Walene James.
Now beware, folks, I have saved the best for last. The Clinton
Administration has buckled under the pressure to implement a stepped up
mass vaccination program. Every day I see stories of the various state
laws forcing Americans to inject these poisons into their veins and
don't buckle to the pressure, because you don't have to because no one,
absolutely no one, can force you to inject anything into your blood,
and no one can force you or your children to be vaccinated. I've
avoided vaccinations, and you can, too.
They will threaten you with not letting your kids go to school, or
not get a job, or anything else they can think of, but it is all,
excuse this folks, it's all bullshit. However, if enough people do not
speak up now, we may all be forced to take in these horrible poisons.
Often, all it takes to avoid vaccinations, is a simple form you can
type up by yourself, referring to Senate bill 942 #3380, under the
title, Exemption From Immunizations, and let me read that bill right
now, it's really interesting. 3380. Immunization of a person shall not
be required for admission to a school or other institution if the
guardian parent or adult has assumed responsibility for his or her
custody or care in the case of a minor, or the person seeking admission
themselves, files with the governing authority a letter or affidavit
stating that such vaccination is contrary to his or her belief.
The other thing you can do is go to your doctor and ask for a
vaccination guarantee. Basically, what you're saying in this little
form is that, you're guaranteeing me that this vaccination will protect
me and not cause any nasty side effects, or you will give me a million
dollars. And if a doctor refuses to sign that you can refuse to get the
Now, even better, there's a book written by a lawyer who's done a
lot in this area and has a lot of first-hand experience in
circumventing vaccination laws. It's called, Dangers of Compulsory
Immunizations; How to Avoid Them Legally, by Tom Finn.
Your best bet is also to get a copy of a little booklet called,
Vaccinations Do Not Protect, by Eleanor McBean. Get a pen, folks. You
won't find these books in Barnes and Noble.
You can call 203-929-1557, that's 203-929-1557, and ask for Jo
Willard, because the only place I know you can get any of the books I
talked about today, is from an organization called Natural Hygiene, in
Connecticut. That's 203-929-1557, and ask for Jo Willard.
In the McBean book are the forms that I mentioned earlier. It'll be
four bucks, or maybe ten bucks, if you get both of them. You can even
learn how to travel abroad without getting vaccinated, folks.
Get educated and let your representatives in Congress know, and let
your family doctors know that you know what's going on, because you
have to protect yourself and your kids.
Your congressmen and doctors may not have any clue about any of
this, and you have to educate them, because most doctors are woefully
ignorant of these things, and have also, like you and me, abdicated
their responsibilities for most of their life.